敬告：頭腦容易發熱者，請勿閱讀及回覆本文，謝謝。
「風波裡的茶杯」此"戲"演到這個章回，實在精彩！眾人多數把
火力集中在W 姑娘身上。可她貴為企業高層，替老闆擋子彈係工
作的一部份。狂罵她的大眾，何以不考究一下商台的超高層在想
甚麼？或者係，到底發生了甚麼事搞出如此"軒然大波"？不妨問
問自己："假如我是何老先生，面對連年的盈利倒退或虧蝕，我會
怎樣想，怎樣做？"
C台，顧名思議，一切以商業利益為依歸。每一個老闆，心中都
有個"天秤"去量度員工的利弊。當一個員工，連年替公司增值，
又擦亮公司的招牌，當然重重有賞，享有六位數字的月薪和至
尊級的地位。然而，一旦那位員工的增值能力衰退，變成公司
的負累時，老闆一係耐心忍下去，希望員工重拾壯態，再創高
峰；不然只好手起刀落，"割蓆"可也。
一個優秀的老闆，從來不怕缺乏人材，人材自會找上來當食客。
當手上的皇牌，高峰不再，增值機能漸衰，薪水高據不下，成本
負擔越重時，聰明的老闆自會找來一些"新血"補充。如果新人能
勝任大局，舊人的下場，便只有"下課"的一途 --- "蛋"、"毛"兩
高薪職員之下台，或多或少給人看到C台老闆的算盤，和權鬥白
熱化下，該機構在策略上的改變。
大班雖說替C台盡了不少心力，但C台也不算太虧待他 -- 高薪厚
祿外，還助他打了不少誹謗官司。我等局外人，實在難算誰欠了
誰。真要怪，也只好怪C台"炒人"炒得太難看，太不高明。至於
大班訴苦說公司從沒對他曉以"合約精神"的大義，則令人失笑。
縱橫商場多年的"大班"，還要人明言合約精神 ？老闆不會永遠
在賣人情給你，當成功令人變得"飄飄然"，變得跋扈不順，其實
是在迫老闆收回你的"特權"。
機構有人事鬥爭問題，實屬平常，可竟有無聊無腦者大噴"維園
阿佰"式的"邏輯"，說電台擁有公眾大氣電波，不能夠不反映人
民的聲音云云。按理，就算私營電台變成中共中央台，何如？
你可以選擇不聽！大班他沒有給關進秦城，大可重開網站當人
民喉舌；若然能夠給他再度高價沽售網站的股份，更屬美事也！
而最最可笑的，非牆頭草政客李某給人家譏諷"棄兵曳甲"莫屬，
的確，論調轉槍頭和棄兵曳甲，李某的資歷和經驗絕對在眾人
之上。哈哈。:-)
後記：Colin 寫了篇相關的文章，有空不妨看看。又，阿妹這
篇"犯賤"都好正。
15 comments:
BY Gekko
Albert Cheng has no chance of getting into Legco because none of the democrats will give way. If he wants to compete for a legco place, he will immediately become enemy of the democrats. Politics are ugly.
Nor will he want to because of his intricate business interests, recall the news that he sells mosquito prevention devices to the housing authority at twice the market price?
棄甲曳兵出於《孟子》：「填然鼓之，兵刃既接，棄甲曳兵而走。或百步而後止，或五十步而後止，以五十步笑百步，則何如？」
檯面睇…………………..
三個口水佬合演一齣驚天大逃亡. 一群高薪低能大學教書佬從旁解畫,
描述形勢如何險惡, 言論自由已界瀕死邊緣. 一眾民主義和團戰士聽得蠢血沸騰, 為精神領袖慘遭迫害而嚎哭. 誓要化悲憤為力量--但唔係去做自殺炸彈.
如此險惡形勢, 當然只有無所不能的偉大民主派政客可以拯救香港.
你只要投出神聖的一票, 你就可以脫離水深火熱的險境. 對一 d 智力比人猿稍
高少少嘅團友, 根本無需要多講, 你手中一票就係子彈, 將你痛恨嘅保皇黨擊斃.
你係人民, 你作主要邊個消失就邊個消失, 爽呢 ?
本來此劇本處處犯駁，破綻百出．例如兩個口水佬不約而同喺九月選舉後
就可以復出，惡勢力到時自然無喇喇人間蒸發，口水佬生命威脅忽然解除．．．
商台係劇中重要平台，舊年口水班已經演出過一齣 “口水禁運“ 活劇, 商台因此無風無浪續約12年. 可能有人食過翻尋味, 仲加大戲碼. 但今次商台忽然變咗受害者, 俾人一鑊翹起.. 無他, 有 d 人一朝得志, 自我膨脹 , 話我為你賺咗冇十億都八億, 言下之意好明顯, 睇死你唔敢郁生金蛋嘅雞, 而且仲係兩隻雞.
自古功高震主係大忌, 當事人仲飛揚拔扈睇死老細冇佢唔得. 令人聯想到雍正朝代個年羹堯.
昨日鏡頭所見真係有趣, 俞琤靠呢種癲狗亂咬式 phone –in 大收廣告費, 誰知有咁嘅一日自己做咗被咬對象, 有佢講冇你講. 而當日被大班破口大罵, 眼淚隨傳隨到嘅高永文, 竟無意中傳受咗淚彈絕招俾大班.
有人竟大呼口號 “俞琤下台”, 下咩台?
有人成日講文革點點點, 講共產黨點專制恐怖, 有點樣嘅人民就有點樣嘅政府.
點解會有文革 ? 因為億萬嘅死蠢愚民頭腦發熱, 今日, 不到香港, 不知文革還在攪!
By Gekko
Hk is now undergoing a cultural revolution in which anyone who are in the like of talk show hosts, pro-democratic camp etc cannot be fired or removed or with contract not renewed, as this will immediately be labelled as anti-democratic, anti-freedom etc, i.e. bad guys. For instance, tai pan, yu chung yin of equal opportunity commission, a scholar recently not renewed by the govt commision etc.
They once employed can never be fired or removed.
So, I have decided to announce today that i am a pro-frantic-democrat and extreme-anti-govt to my boss and everyone in my company, and my job will be immediately secured for life.
gary6696:
Good one, actually i think can't say whoes right or wrong between, C radio and Mr. Cheng. But Mr. Lee is 200% dogdog. He still can't accept he can get any position offer from the HKSAR, he lose in the election. He still dreaming when he got take good care by the British Gov't. His good old days. Poor Man.
對一 d 智力比人猿稍
高少少嘅團友, 根本無需要多講
---------------------------
hahaha！
lee 句好扺死！
亞維
維：呢d 係飛毛腿大哥的金句！
其他各位：各有各的觀點及立論，恕小弟不奉賠了。
--- 收買佬
飛哥你真正, 野野錐中要害.
聽完鄭先生近日的發言，我更不知道鄭先生是放假還是封咪，這二個詞語的意思有很大的差別．
據說鄭先生是因為多年來受到多次的恐嚇而封咪， 不是報警就可以解決．
為何他不積極地面對， 跟警方合作， 就說沒有用呢? 既然他多次受到恐嚇，為何他不隨身預備錄音機，當再受到恐嚇時，就錄音，交給警方．
既然鄭先生已經公開表示自己受到恐嚇而封咪，為何他不詳細交代事件經過，而要令公眾胡亂猜測．
這是否真正的恐嚇呢？我很質疑，看看李鵬飛，就是一個很好的例子．簡直是一場鬧劇．
最後祝貴台的節目越來越有質數，但請不要忘記自由，公平公正，並不等如自己喜歡做什麼就做什麼，並不等如自己做任何事情都是對．
一位聽眾上
i tried to add some minor amendments to my piece and then to repost it. so i tried to delete the post first. but it seemed i was unable to do so. so i didnt do the repost. now it seems the deletion was finally effected, but quite some time after. sorry abt that.
i did save the piece. but it's not with me now. will post it back asa i have it.
使鬼Amendment咩？直頭repost過得啦。~~
--- 收買佬
I sympathise with Taipan and the threats, but Commercial Radio has a station to run.
I think Taipan is doing himself and his listeners a disservice by saying he will come back after the Legco elections.
I was particulary angry when he said in a television interview on Wednesday, that "my microphone has been taken away"
No Taipan, you walked away from it.
.
as u come to concerns with readers' sentiment, as a matter of courtesy, i would first of all declare i'm happy in sharing the following comments. : P
- a business perspective is one of the legitimate persectives from which to see the whole matter. indeed the whole thing may be redcued to simply an incident of bad PR or poor management.
- obviously CR has long built an image (or a brand) of itself being a public utility with all the values apparent in their slogans. the values, genuine or not, r also evident in their organisational culture (which is not the management's own making!). it is on this level come all the public outcry, concerns and debate! if there were not a public dimenion built in CR's private business, things would have become very different. it would be just like TVB firing an artist from time to time.
- besides a matter of image/brand, there's not totally no grounds on which to demand the CR to bear whatever extent of public accountability. their licence is granted by govt. what if the licence had been put up for auction?
finally some general comments relating to managing ppl and talents.
> 一個優秀的老闆，從來不怕缺乏人材，人材自會找上來當食客。
> 當手上的皇牌，高峰不再，增值機能漸衰，薪水高據不下，成本
> 負擔越重時，聰明的老闆自會找來一些"新血"補充。如果新人能
> 勝任大局，舊人的下場，便只有"下課"的一途
> 老闆不會永遠在賣人情給你，當成功令人變得"飄飄然"，變得跋扈不
> 順，其實是在迫老闆收回你的"特權"。
- unless 優秀的老闆 means "almighty", talents do not necessarily go to the most successful business organisations/bosses at any point of time. rather, it's abt right ppl and right fit with organisation at the rgiht time. it's "war for talents" rather than the other way round.
- it's difficult to assess and assert albert cheng is "高峰不再，增值機能漸衰" or a liability rather than an asset. to a certain extent the public outcry and the damage being done to the CR's coporate image serves as quite a proof in this regard. was there wrong calculation?
- firing staff to cut costs is a popular step to take to make financial figures look good and please shareholders. it's ok if it's strategically wise and necessary, not only in the short term, but for the sake of sustainble success. more importantly, it's also about how! in trying to do so, really 聰明的老闆 would not do it if it is going to be done at the expense of corporate images (which is especially important in CR's business area) and its organsational culture!
[By: 愛國左仔]
佢話蔡子強講師將o吾會做風波節目，正在物色適當o既人選頂替，咁o岩佢又見倒小弟o係 xo-cat o既言論。
佢覺得小弟o既言論非常客觀；非常持平；非常理性，非常配合商台未來o既方向喎‧‧‧‧‧‧
﹝下刪三萬有關讚賞小弟o既字數﹞
份合約三年，三個月試用期，你o地話我簽o吾簽好呢？
簽o左就以後要夜晚至有時間見倒大家架喇！
好o吾捨得我o係 xo-cat o的忠實 fan 屎呀！
不過你o地以後都可以o係 881903.com 同小弟傾計架！
各位網友o吾好喊啦！
Post a Comment